
When someone comes up with a new invention, one of the first questions they often ask involves timing and protection. Many people file a provisional patent application because it feels simple, affordable, and temporary. It offers a grace period while the inventor continues to refine the idea. Still, once that year is up, things get complicated. The question of whether a provisional patent application can be converted after it expires is one that frequently comes up, and the answer is more rigid than many inventors expect. Read on and reach out to a New Orleans, Louisiana patent lawyer from Lemler IP to learn more.
A provisional patent application lasts for exactly twelve months, and once that year passes, it disappears automatically. Nothing about the filing carries over. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is notoriously strict regarding this deadline. If the year ends and a nonprovisional application has not been filed, the provisional lapses entirely.
This can be frustrating for inventors who believed the provisional would remain as a placeholder on its own. The system is designed to encourage timely action, and that means the responsibility falls squarely on the applicant to track the deadline and take the next step before the clock runs out.
Generally, once a provisional expires, it cannot be extended. However, there is one narrow exception. If a nonprovisional application is filed within two months after the provisional’s expiration, the applicant may file a petition to restore the benefit of the provisional’s priority date. To succeed, the applicant must prove that the delay in filing was ‘unintentional’ and pay a significant petition fee. Aside from this specific two-month grace period, if the deadline is missed, the priority date is typically lost forever and it cannot be converted, extended, revived, or restored. The law treats it as though it never existed.
Many inventors are surprised to learn that the provisional confers no actual patent rights; it simply establishes an early filing date if it is followed by a nonprovisional within the allowed year. Without that follow-up filing, the date is lost. Even worse, if the invention was publicly disclosed during that year, the inventor may lose the ability to seek protection altogether.
There is a very narrow window for reclaiming patent rights after public disclosure, and once the provisional expires, that window can shrink further depending on the timing and nature of the disclosure. This is why missing the deadline can become a costly mistake.
If the provisional has already expired and the narrow two-month exception is either not granted or the associated petition is not filed within that timeframe, the only option is to start over by filing a new application, provided the invention is still eligible. If someone is still within the twelve-month period, they should file a nonprovisional application as soon as possible to preserve the original filing date.
A nonprovisional requires more detail, tighter drafting, and a clear explanation of the invention’s structure and function. This is where the help of a knowledgeable attorney can go a long way.
If you need assistance with anything patent-related, please don’t hesitate to contact Lemler IP for an initial consultation today.
© 2025 Lemler IP. All rights reserved.
Attorney Advertising